Should Harry Kane drop deep or not?published at 12:11 BST 12 June
Q&A with Umir
Umir Irfan
Football tactics correspondent
Image source, Getty ImagesKieron, Darwen: Umir, are England a better team when Harry Kane drops deeper to spread the play? Or is it better if he stays in and around the penalty area? Is there room for both Morgan Rogers and Jude Bellingham in the team?
Personally I think Kane is much better used dropping deep (and so does Vincent Kompany and Thomas Tuchel!) One reason is for for his ability to provide the team with great passing quality for runners ahead of the ball like Luis Diaz at Bayern, Son Heung-min at Spurs and now Anthony Gordon and Marcus Rashford for England.
If teams man-mark him when he drops deep, there is space left in the opponent's defence for the runners we've mentioned. If they don't follow him, he becomes a spare man in midfield, helping England keep good possession and with time and space he can play dangerous passes.
This tactic also helps him score, more interestingly. By dropping deep, he is slower to arrive to the final third. As teams drop closer to their goal when defending, space opens up in front of their back line. Kane often finds himself in these areas unmarked - able to score from distance.
There can be room for Rogers and Bellingham with Rogers on the left but it goes against Tuchel's system - I doubt we see it.
Tuchel wants wingers who are good one against one able to run down the line - think Gordon, Rashford, Noni Madueke. This helps push teams deeper and opens up space in front of defences for the likes of Kane, Bellingham and Declan Rice to score from. Watch the first goal against Costa Rica for a good example.











