BBC HomeExplore the BBC
This page has been archived and is no longer updated. Find out more about page archiving.

20 February 2015
The Good Friday Agreement

BBC Homepage
BBC NI Homepage
BBC NI Learning

»
The Good Friday Agreement
  The Agreement
  Constitutional Issues
  Governance
  Intergovernmental relations
  Equality and rights
  Policing and Justice
  Society
  Economy
  Culture
  Reconciliation

Links to other resources

 

Contact Us


Page:  <  1  2  > 
Unionist Politics

by Feargal Cochrane

Cork University Press 2001

The Mitchell Review lasted for ten weeks, until an acceptable sequence was agreed between the UUP and Sinn Féin that would see separate statements issued by both parties recommitting themselves to the Good Friday Agreement. On 18 November, following another exhaustive round of meetings with all the parties, Mitchell signaled that his review was complete and that the outcome was a positive one. I believe that a basis now exists for devolution to occur, for the institutions to be established, and for decommissioning to take place as soon as possible. Devolution should take effect, then the Executive should meet, and then the paramilitary groups should appoint their authorised representatives, all on the same day, in that order. I hereby recommend to the governments and the parties that they make the necessary arrangements to proceed, and call on them to do so without delay. 39 Before the Mitchell Review had been completed, Mo Mowlam had been replaced as Secretary of State for Northern Ireland. Peter Mandelson was appointed to the job on 11 October 1999 and immediately signaled his commitment to the successful completion of the review process. 'There is no alternative to the Good Friday Agreement. There is no plan B. It is that or nothing.' 40 In return for the UUP agreeing to the triggering of the d'Hondt mechanism that would facilitate the forming of the Executive and the other institutions 'going live', the IRA would appoint a senior figure of its organisation as an 'interlocutor' with General John de Chastelain's decommissioning commission to establish a timetable for weapons to be 'put beyond use' by the original deadline in the Agreement of 22 May 2000. On 17 November, an IRA statement was released stating its commitment to a peaceful settlement and its intentions over decommissioning. This was a crucial part of the jigsaw that would be pieced together over the next two weeks and lead eventually to the implementation of the Agreement. The crucial section of the IRA statement declared that: In our view, the Good Friday agreement is a significant development, and we believe its full implementation will contribute to the achievement of lasting peace. . . . The IRA is willing to further enhance the peace process and consequently, following the establishment of the institutions agreed on Good Friday last year, the IRA leadership will appoint a representative to enter into discussions with Gen John de Chastelain and the Independent International Commission on Decommissioning.41 Everything now hinged on a meeting of the Ulster Unionist Council, scheduled for Saturday 27 November. A hothouse atmosphere pervaded the unionist community and the rest of Northern Ireland in the days leading up to this meeting, as Trimble made a concerted effort to sell what was a substantial compromise to his party and to the wider unionist community. In effect, Trimble was seeking to move from the old mantra of 'no guns - no government', which had underpinned his party's policy up to this point, to something akin to 'government, then guns'. Inevitably, of course, this exercise in political pragmatism entrenched the divisions within the UUP and was seized upon by anti-Agreement unionists. Trimble admitted that a shift in his position over weapons decommissioning had taken place, though argued that this was merely a tactical manoeuvre to achieve the same end, rather than a compromise over principle. Unsurprisingly, his opponents did not concur. On the day before the meeting of the UUC, Trimble made an appeal to the unionist community in an article in the News Letter. He argued that despite the proposed shift from 'no guns, no government', his policy offered the best hope for securing the Union and of building a peaceful future within Northern Ireland. The Mitchell review lasted 10 weeks. I now believe that the proposals agreed and on the table offer the best chance we will get to achieve both our objectives of decommissioning and devolution. Yes, it is not the same as prior decommissioning, but it provides the only mechanism deliverable to achieve guns and government. . . . It is time to put the Republican movement to the test. If this plan works, Ulster Unionists will have secured decommissioning and devolution. The prize is enormous. We have a chance on the eve of the Millennium to build a society focused on the real issues that matter to our children. We must and I believe we will, do our utmost to create this better future. 42 Trimble's opponents (including the majority of his parliamentary party) refused to accept that this policy change would result in the achievement of weapons decommissioning, arguing that the requirements of Sinn Féin and the IRA were much too vague and little more than aspirational.

Page:  <  1  2  > 

Return to Essay


About the BBC | Help | Terms of Use | Privacy & Cookies Policy