BBC HomeExplore the BBC
This page has been archived and is no longer updated. Find out more about page archiving.

20 February 2015
The Good Friday Agreement

BBC Homepage
BBC NI Homepage
BBC NI Learning

»
The Good Friday Agreement
  The Agreement
  Constitutional Issues
  Governance
  Intergovernmental relations
  Equality and rights
  Policing and Justice
  Society
  Economy
  Culture
  Reconciliation

Links to other resources

 

Contact Us


The Character of the 1998 Agreement: Results and Prospects

by Brendan O'Leary

From: Aspects of the Belfast Agreement edited by Rick Wilford

Oxford University Press 2001

Decommissioning

The Agreement is clear on decommissioning, despite the difficulties it has occasioned. No paramilitaries that abide by the Agreement have to engage in forma surrender to those they opposed in war. The IICD, chaired by Canadian General John de Chastelain, was to assist the participants in achieving 'the total disarmament of all paramilitary organisations'. The parties that (informally) represented paramilitary organisations in the negotiations are required to 'use any influence they may have to achieve the decommissioning of all paramilitary arms within two years, following endorsement in referendums North and South of the agreement and in the context of the implementation of the overall settlement. (The Agreement, para 20, para: 3, emphasis mine).

The italicised passages clarify the termination point for decommissioning, not the moment of commencement, and they make it plain that decommissioning is linked to the implementation of the overall settlement - including the establishment of the governance structures - North, North-South, and East-West - and to achieve a start to decommissioning by the IRA before executive formation in the North, was regarded as a breach of any reasonable interpretation of the text of the Agreement. Without executive formation in the North none of the formal institutions of the Agreement that required the co-operation of the local parties could get underway. Sinn Fein nominated a representative to the International Commission; issued a statement to the effect that the war was over; and for the first time issued an outright condemnation of other republicans - of the Real IRA whose members carried out the Omagh bombing. But until November 1999, David Trimble and some of his senior colleagues were unprepared to regard this activity as sufficient evidence of good intentions. Each move on Sinn Fein's part merely led to the UUP to request more. The Mitchell review of the Agreement, caused by the impasse, recommended an agreed way forward. Devolution, executive formation-triggering the entirety of the institutions of the Agreement-and the appointment of interlocutors to the IICD by the paramilitaries were scheduled to occur, in that order. The scenario duly materialised. However, to win support from his party for reversing his position David Trimble demanded that Sinn Fein achieve an actual start to decommissioning by the IRA otherwise he and his colleagues would resign. Sinn Fein could not or would not deliver the IRA in the way required - and they were not legally bound by the Agreement to do so at that time, though their political obligations were clear. This led to showdown with Peter Mandelson unilaterally deciding to suspend the Assembly to save David Trimble from his own threat of resignation.


Return to Essay


About the BBC | Help | Terms of Use | Privacy & Cookies Policy