Newsnight Review discussed Henry V at the National Theatre.
(Edited highlights of the panel's review taken from the teletext subtitles that are generated live for Newsnight Review.)
TIM LOTT:
It's a real
people's production. Almost an Andy
McNabb influence coming in there! You
got the sense you were in there, there's
armoured vehicles coming on. Possibly
one too many at one point. Lots of bangs
and crashes. It really is a very dynamic and
energetic performance. It's not a play I
have been fond of before. I have never
particularly liked Henry V. I found the
history plays generally rather dull. But I
was entranced throughout. I didn't think
Adrian Lester's performance was perfect. It
lost a lot of its internal life and it was an
exterior performance, in a way. It had
terrific charisma. There are some very long
boring sections in this play, and he dealt
with that terribly well, I felt.
BONNIE GREER:
I think this is easily the first great
Shakespearean production of the 21st
century. This is gorgeous. Hytner could
have done something very, very simple -
made an anti-war play. He doesn't. He puts
war on the stage. You walk out of there
with what you want to take out of it. If you
never understood why this was
Shakespeare's first great hit, you will when
you see this. It has everything. The jokes.
The little foreign stuff going on. The only
thing I don't agree with you about is that I
think that Adrian Lester's performance is
magnificent. It's a very anti-Henry
performance. We usually see very romantic
Henrys or people who play the verse. He
plays helm very metallically, very coldly.
He has a job to do and he sets out to do it.
It's a wonderful performance.
KIRSTY WARK:
On the chilling business, when he puts the
gun to the head of the looter and kills him,
you know it's coming but you still feel...
BONNIE GREER:
There are atrocities on both sides. People
are invoking God on both sides. It is a play
about the reality of war. If you are for war,
you will love it. If you are against war, you
will love it.
KIRSTY WARK:
Hytner points out that spin was around¿
Agincourt was spun right from when it
happened, but what did you make of the
addition of the big screens, and the lovely
moment when some of Henry's speech is
turned into French, for the French.
ADAM MARS-JONES:
It created laugh in itself. Very Iraq, and
very, "Here's how we are going to make
your culture read to itself." It was kept
moving, but the only thing I didn't think
worked was the "once more into the breech
speech", perhaps because it has to be with
people with swords, looking into the eyes
of people they are going to kill. The killing
at a distance didn't work with that
particular thing.
BONNIE GREER:
I think it absolutely worked because it
showed a war-weary young man out to do
what he has to do. We also have to
mention, or I have to say, that this is a
triumph in every way. Cast, but especially
the director. The Olivier is a monster, and
Hytner tames it. It's beautiful.
ADAM MARS-JONES:
The 80s music didn't work, I thought.
TIM LOTT:
There was a fantastic atmosphere. The
promise at the beginning by the chorus,
that we are going to take you to these
places, is absolutely fulfilled. I think the greatest battle
scenes I have ever seen on a stage.
Absolutely. Quite remarkable. I was
absolutely there, and frightened and
shocked, and terrified when the summary
executions were taking place as well. It's a
fantastic battle play.