Newsnight Review discussed the movie Identity with John Cusack as a limo driver and Ray Liotta as a cop.
(Edited highlights of the panel's review taken from the teletext subtitles that are generated live for Newsnight Review.)
MARK KERMODE:
It's a complete piece of fluff, but it does
look like the Bates motel. At the beginning
we have Alfred Molina defending someone
who is about to go to the electric chair on
the basis of possible split personalities. We
have the Agatha Christie 10 Little Indians
reference, which somebody brings up
foolishly. You should never name the text
that you are referencing. If I have a
problem, it's that the director started out as
a really intelligent, low-key, underplayed
director. Copland was the film that made
Sylvester Stallone into a great actor which
nobody thought he could be. This is silly.
It's trash. It's intelligent, well-played
vigorous trash, but it is trash nonetheless.
Also, if you have any kind of genre
awareness, if you watched the Twilight
Zone, if you have a sci-fi interest, I
guarantee that you will get at least one of
the three major twists. It has no substance.
GERMAINE GREER:
It annoyed the hell out of me. I object to
being nailed to my seat by duty ; I can't
even walk out , and being obliged to watch
bodies being whacked, thwacked, bust,
broken, people with baseball bats shoved
down their necks, and being surprised all
the time. It keeps shocking you.
Everything comes with a bang. Every time
anyone goes outdoors, you think they are
going to get jumped.
MARK LAWSON:
It is a horror movie.
GERMAINE GREER:
I don't even get horror movies. Life is
pretty horrible already. If I want horror, I
can tune in to CNN. There's plenty of
horror there. Why do I go to the movies to
see people run over?
MARK LAWSON:
It's suppose to be cathartic isn't it?
GERMAINE GREER:
Bullshit!. People think it's entertainment,
funny or something.
MARK KERMODE:
It's not that it's funny. It's intellectually
titillating. The more you dislike it, the
more you now like it. It's a titillating, fun
90 minutes of pleasure in the cinema that
doesn't mean anything. It's not really
horrible.
GERMAINE GREER:
My pleasure buttons are in a different
place. I get no pleasure whatever out of the
immensely convincing sound of a vehicle
hitting a woman's body at high speed. It
doesn't turn me on. I don't get pleasure out
of seeing walls smeared with the blood.
BILL BUFORD:
I have to admit, I agree with Germaine
completely. I found it so manipulative and
contrived. You were glued to your seat.
You weren't bored, but you weren't bored
because it was so contrived and
manipulative. Whenever you were getting
in a stressful situation, you knew it,
because first you had the drums, then a bit
more percussion, then a high-pitched note,
and then it went quiet. Then something
suddenly happened.
MARK LAWSON:
That's part of it all though isn't it? Those
are the conventions. You're supposed to
go with them.
BILL BUFORD:
It was so manipulative and so contrived.
The camera frame would narrow down,
and you thought, "Here it comes again." At
the end, I felt like I had watched a very
well made but finally empty music video.
MARK LAWSON:
Mark, I did think this was well made. I
spotted one of the key twists in it, but even
so it kept me surprised?
MARK KERMODE:
I think the problem is that, because it's
directed by James Mangle, it looks bigger
and serious than it is. In a way, you would
feel more sympathetic towards it if it just
looked like a cheap B movie, which is
actually what it is.
BILL BUFORD:
It's called Identity and it's about
dissociative personality. It has this
intellectual conceit, saying, "Come on, take
me seriously."
MARK LAWSON:
Isn't Cusack there because it does want to
be taken seriously?
BILL BUFORD:
He is there because the director is one
whose reputation is good enough to get
those actors around him. They all then play
a parlour game, a rollercoaster, and it
works. The fact that there are moments
with big loud bangs to make you jump,
that's what you go to the cinema for.