BBC NEWS
BBCi CATEGORIES   TV   RADIO   COMMUNICATE   WHERE I LIVE   INDEX    SEARCH 

BBC News UK Edition
 You are in: Education  
News Front Page
World
UK
England
N Ireland
Scotland
Wales
Politics
Business
Entertainment
Science/Nature
Technology
Health
Education
Hot Topics
UK Systems
League Tables
Features
-------------
Talking Point
-------------
Country Profiles
In Depth
-------------
Programmes
-------------
BBC Sport
BBC Weather
CBBC News
SERVICES
-------------
EDITIONS
Wednesday, 5 December, 2001, 00:12 GMT
Richmond holds on to primary lead
Primary pupils
The average results for primary schools have improved
Richmond-upon-Thames has once again achieved the best primary school test results in England.

The borough in south-west London, which recorded a slight increase in its results, maintained its position as the highest scoring education authority for primary schools.

Click here for BBC News Online's tables
How education authorities performed

In second and third places are the very small authorities - Isles of Scilly and City of London.

But in fourth place is Wokingham, which came third in this year's secondary league tables - and which overall could be judged as the highest performing education authority.

Islington's former education service
Islington - now a privatised education authority - continues to struggle

Among the top 10 education authorities there are only two changes from last year, including the entry of one of the most improved authorities, Warrington, which has risen from 37th place last year to ninth this year.

Other authorities showing substantial points increases were Blackpool, Hammersmith and Fulham and Camden.

The results could vindicate an innovative scheme promoted by Blackpool Borough Council, in which vouchers for burgers were used as an incentive to reward pupils' attendance and academic achievement.

The tables also show that there can be substantial differences between performance at primary and secondary level.

This year's leading primary authority, Richmond-upon-Thames, is not in the top 20 at secondary level.

And Redbridge, among the most successful at secondary level, is not in the top 40 for primary schools.

Rural failure

The stereotype of struggling inner-city authorities is also challenged by examples of underachievement in rural counties and affluent southern England - with Norfolk, East Sussex, Kent, Wiltshire and Somerset all below the national average.

At the lower end of the table, Bradford has slipped two places to record this year's lowest score.

Last year's bottom rung authority, City of Nottingham, is now one place above Bradford.

Among the bottom 10 authorities, there were four changes, with the biggest point score fall recorded by Islington, which fell 22 places to seventh from bottom.

The north London borough, which now has a privatised education service, was the third worst performer at secondary level.

Truancy in London

The London boroughs of Greenwich and Hackney remain in the bottom 10 - but Haringey, Newham and Manchester have all moved up the performance table.

There are also signs of the gap narrowing between the top and bottom authorities - with the lowest scoring four authorities all showing improved results.

Education authorities have also been ranked in terms of truancy and absenteeism, with inner-city London authorities among the worst.

The highest truancy rate was in Lewisham, followed by Newham, Southwark, Hackney and Tower Hamlets.

The table below shows the relative performance of England's local education authorities in their schools' Key Stage 2 national curriculum test results.

The columns show the average point score (APS), the aggregate score of the tests in English, maths and science (AGG), the change in this from last year, and the rate of unauthorised absence.

Click on the name of any individual authority for a full list of its schools' results.

(FM) indicates results significantly affected by the foot and mouth outbreak.

LEA APS AGG +/- absent
Richmond upon Thames 28.8 259.5 2.4 0.3%
Isles of Scilly 27.4 257.9 4.6 0.0%
City of London 28.4 257.1 10.7 0.9%
Wokingham 28.5 256.3 0.9 0.3%
Kensington and Chelsea 28.2 255.1 -0.4 1.1%
Barnet 28.2 251.7 2.2 0.6%
Surrey 28.1 250.6 -1.9 0.4%
Rutland 28.1 249.3 -6.9 0.2%
Warrington 27.9 248.9 9.1 0.3%
Solihull 28.2 248.8 1.0 0.3%
North Yorkshire 27.9 247.8 0.3 0.2%
Buckinghamshire 28.2 247.7 3.9 0.2%
Hillingdon 27.9 247.6 7.5 0.8%
Cheshire 27.9 247.6 0.7 0.4%
Bury 27.8 247 -0.7 0.4%
Kingston upon Thames 28.0 246.8 1.7 0.3%
Bromley 27.9 246.8 3.1 0.4%
Bracknell Forest 27.7 246.5 4.1 0.3%
Hertfordshire 27.9 246.1 0.8 0.3%
Sefton 27.8 245.9 0.5 0.3%
Stockport 27.7 245.4 2.7 0.4%
City of Westminster 27.9 245.2 2.4 0.9%
North Somerset 27.8 244.7 3.2 0.3%
West Berkshire 27.8 244.4 2.9 0.3%
Havering 27.7 244.3 3.3 0.2%
Windsor and Maidenhead 27.8 244 4.3 0.4%
Hammersmith and Fulham 27.7 243.6 14.4 0.8%
Trafford 28.0 243.5 -4.8 0.2%
Gloucestershire 27.8 243.5 6.5 0.3%
Herefordshire 27.6 243.5 4.3 0.4%
Sutton 27.7 243.3 2.3 0.5%
Harrow 27.8 243.1 -3.6 0.4%
Shropshire 27.7 242.6 -1.8 0.1%
Hampshire 27.7 242.3 -0.6 0.4%
Darlington 27.8 242 8.7 0.3%
South Gloucestershire 27.6 241.8 -0.6 0.4%
St Helens 27.6 241.7 0.3 0.3%
City of York 27.6 241.6 3.3 0.5%
Cumbria 27.6 241.1 0.5 0.2%
Bath and North East Somerset 27.7 240.5 -1.0 0.2%
Leicestershire 27.6 240.4 1.0 0.2%
East Riding of Yorkshire 27.5 240.1 -2.7 0.2%
Wigan 27.5 239.4 6.5 0.4%
North Tyneside 27.4 239.4 2.5 0.1%
Gateshead 27.5 239.2 2.5 0.4%
Wirral 27.6 238.9 4.6 0.4%
Redbridge 27.5 238.5 3.7 0.9%
Camden 27.4 238.2 12.8 1.4%
Bolton 27.4 238 5.7 0.4%
Ealing 27.3 237.9 9.1 0.3%
Brent 27.3 237.4 4.3 0.6%
Durham 27.4 237.2 2.2 0.1%
Warwickshire 27.4 236.9 -0.8 0.2%
Dorset 27.4 236.5 -4.7 0.3%
Redcar and Cleveland 27.3 235.8 5.2 0.3%
Lincolnshire 27.4 235.7 3.4 0.3%
West Sussex 27.4 235.7 -0.1 0.3%
Lancashire 27.3 235.7 0.2 0.4%
Bexley 27.5 235.5 1.3 0.3%
Torbay 27.4 235.5 4.4 0.4%
Cambridgeshire 27.4 234.9 -1.0 0.4%
Devon 27.4 234.9 2.5 0.3%
North Lincolnshire 27.3 234.8 0.3 0.2%
Calderdale 27.4 234.6 7.4 0.3%
Staffordshire 27.4 234.6 -0.5 0.3%
Enfield 27.2 234.3 12.5 1.2%
Leeds 27.3 234.2 -0.4 0.6%
Northamptonshire 27.3 233.9 2.9 0.5%
Northumberland 27.3 233.5 1.1 0.2%
Oxfordshire 27.3 233.4 0.1 0.4%
Essex 27.3 233.2 0.5 0.4%
Bournemouth 27.2 233.2 -0.5 0.3%
South Tyneside 27.2 233.1 4.0 0.2%
national averages 27.3 233 2.0 0.5%
Cornwall 27.2 232.8 -0.2 0.3%
Slough 27.1 232.5 3.3 0.7%
Derbyshire 27.3 232.4 0.0 0.4%
Barking and Dagenham 27.1 232.3 2.2 1.3%
Croydon 27.3 232.2 3.7 0.8%
Stockton on Tees 27.3 232.2 -2.2 0.3%
Halton 27.2 232.2 1.8 0.7%
Blackpool 27.1 232.2 15.0 0.8%
Southend 27.3 232 6.4 0.6%
Hounslow 27.3 231.7 2.7 1.1%
Nottinghamshire 27.3 231.2 4.8 0.4%
Suffolk (FM) 27.2 231.1 1.7 0.2%
Bedfordshire 27.1 231.1 0.5 0.2%
Somerset 27.2 230.8 0.5 0.3%
Hartlepool 27.2 230.7 5.9 0.8%
Wakefield 27.1 230.7 1.5 0.5%
Wiltshire 27.0 229.6 -1.6 0.3%
City of Plymouth 27.0 229.4 3.2 0.4%
Isle of Wight 27.0 229.4 3.0 0.2%
Knowsley 26.9 229.1 7.5 1.0%
Sunderland 27.1 228.9 2.3 0.2%
Tameside 27.0 228.6 1.7 0.2%
Merton 26.9 228.4 -1.0 0.6%
Kirklees 27.1 228.3 6.7 0.6%
Salford 27.0 228.3 -0.7 0.6%
Norfolk 27.0 228.3 0.2 0.5%
East Sussex 26.9 228.1 -1.5 0.5%
Rotherham 27.0 227.9 5.1 0.6%
Rochdale 26.8 227.6 7.9 0.5%
Oldham 26.9 227.5 2.7 0.4%
City of Peterborough 27.0 227 2.7 0.6%
Wandsworth 27.1 226.9 5.4 0.6%
Kent (FM) 27.1 226.5 1.0 0.4%
Middlesbrough 27.0 226.5 10.6 0.5%
Tower Hamlets 26.8 225.8 10.5 1.5%
Doncaster 27.0 224.9 7.2 0.6%
City of Derby 27.0 224.5 10.5 0.7%
Dudley 26.9 224.5 1.7 0.4%
Swindon 26.7 224.4 -1.6 0.3%
Worcestershire 26.8 224.3 -0.5 0.3%
Lewisham 26.8 223.8 9.1 1.9%
Poole 26.8 223.5 -4.0 0.5%
Stoke on Trent 26.8 223.5 2.4 0.7%
North East Lincolnshire 26.9 223.4 3.8 0.3%
Brighton and Hove 27.0 222.9 -2.4 0.7%
Birmingham (FM) 26.8 222.7 4.7 0.7%
City of Kingston upon Hull 26.7 222.7 9.8 0.8%
Reading 26.8 221.7 9.6 0.8%
Telford and Wrekin 26.7 221.3 -3.2 0.4%
Coventry 26.6 220.3 -3.1 0.3%
Portsmouth 26.6 219.8 6.5 0.8%
Lambeth 26.7 218.5 6.5 1.4%
Liverpool 26.6 218.4 0.0 0.7%
Luton 26.5 218.1 -0.8 0.7%
Southampton 26.5 215.8 0.0 0.9%
Blackburn with Darwen 26.4 215.7 -7.5 0.6%
Newham 26.3 215.5 7.9 1.7%
Medway 26.6 214.7 -4.1 0.5%
Wolverhampton 26.3 214.6 -0.3 0.7%
Manchester 26.4 214.2 6.9 1.1%
Sheffield 26.5 214.1 -0.6 0.9%
Thurrock 26.2 214 5.2 0.7%
Haringey 26.5 213.7 10.8 1.9%
Milton Keynes 26.5 213 -1.4 0.4%
Sandwell 26.3 212.9 10.4 0.5%
Waltham Forest 26.4 212.1 2.4 0.6%
Walsall 26.3 211.8 1.2 0.6%
Barnsley (FM) 26.4 211.1 -3.4 0.8%
Newcastle Upon Tyne 26.4 209.7 -5.1 0.6%
Southwark 26.1 209 6.8 1.7%
Islington 26.0 208.8 -8.1 1.2%
City of Bristol 26.4 208.4 1.3 1.1%
Leicester City 26.1 206.5 -1.6 0.7%
Greenwich 26.2 206.3 0.9 1.3%
Hackney 25.9 203.8 6.7 1.6%
City of Nottingham 25.9 203.2 10.6 0.8%
Bradford 25.9 201.6 3.0 0.9%

Back to main text

 WATCH/LISTEN
 ON THIS STORY
The BBC's Rory Maclean
"Some targets are yet to be hit"
The 2001 school and college performance tables

ENGLAND PRIMARY

Analysis

SCOTLAND

Feature

ENGLAND 11-18

Features
Links to more Education stories are at the foot of the page.


E-mail this story to a friend

Links to more Education stories

© BBC ^^ Back to top

News Front Page | World | UK | England | N Ireland | Scotland | Wales |
Politics | Business | Entertainment | Science/Nature | Technology |
Health | Education | Talking Point | Country Profiles | In Depth |
Programmes