|
MONEY TALK
By Brendan Barber
TUC general secretary elect
|
Are Employers being given bad pensions advice?
Every day we read about yet another employer closing
its final salary pension scheme to new members.
It makes difficult reading each time you look in the
paper or hear it on the news.
We hear many of the arguments about why companies are
closing their final salary schemes, such as the fall
in the stock market, people living longer, red tape,
and so on.
In addition there is no doubt that some of
the pressure is coming from the City.
Credit ratings fall
We know from talking with employers that there is some investor
pressure on them to close final salary schemes as a
way of supposedly capping pension costs.
Also, credit rating agencies have already begun to
downgrade companies where they have
large pension liabilities, although in recent weeks a
number of companies have questioned whether the
agencies properly understand pension scheme
liabilities.
If an employer shuts a pension scheme today it still
has to pay the benefits promised by that scheme for
decades.
|
Without question a range of pressures are being
brought to bear on employers continuing to offer good
final salary schemes.
Short-term concerns
The TUC would of course argue
that employers should continue to offer these schemes
for their own sake but we are also increasingly
concerned that employers are being offered a false
solution to pension costs.
Many of the reasons given for shutting final salary
schemes are based on short-term concerns.
But pension schemes by their very nature are long-term, and any
decisions should be taken from a long-term view.
Given the size of many pension funds these days they are
effectively financial super tankers - their costs
cannot be turned around quickly.
Costs rising
If an employer shuts a pension scheme today it still
has to pay the benefits promised by that scheme for
decades.
So shutting a final salary scheme and opening
up a money purchase one does not reduce an employers
costs in the short term - in fact it might actually
put them up.
Put simply there is no short-term solution to rising pension costs.
The best thing that many employers can do in the
current environment is ride out the storm of poor
investment returns.
|
But taking a short-term stance on pensions issues
can create long-term damage to companies.
Changes to pension schemes are very damaging for staff morale and
given much greater employer awareness, could also lead
to deteriorating industrial relations.
And it will not satisfy investors either.
The effect of closing a
scheme will not impact for years - much longer than most investors' time horizons.
Riding the storm
The best thing that many employers can do in the
current environment is ride out the storm of poor
investment returns.
Markets will turn up again and
when they do final salary schemes will become cheaper
again, perhaps cheaper than some of the money purchase
schemes currently being established.
Employers should concentrate on other ways of dealing with short-term costs.
For our part trade unionists have demonstrated that we
will work with employers to retain just good schemes
even if this means there must be substantial moves
from employees.
A number of recent deals have seen
unions agree to increase member contributions to
pension schemes in order to keep a good scheme open.
And in the meantime employers should be wary of siren
voices which suggest simplistic short-term solutions
that won't deliver for the company, its employees or
its investors.